The Crusades



Western Europe's most ambitious common enterprise and its most conspicuous failure was the attempt to bring together all mankind in Christian unity under the leadership of the bishop of Rome, St. Peter's successor, the pope. The most intense part of this enterprise and the one that enlisted the most widespread support in Europe from all levels of society was the Crusades.

The Crusades in the narrow sense of the expeditions to conquer and hold the Holy Land for the West began at the end of the eleventh century and lasted throughout the remainder of the medieval period. In a more inclusive sense, the Crusades include several other important contributing factors:The reconquest of Spain and Sicily from he Moslems;

 


The Crusades inspired the most dedicated valor, the most bloodthirsty cruelty, and the greediest vandalism of medieval men. They offered the fullest opportunity for combined fulfillment of Germanic heroic aspirations and Christian ideals of brotherhood and self-sacrifice.

Early relations with the Muslims were relatively simple. They were mainly military. When the Muslims moved westward along the north African coast after the death of Mohammed, western European Christians were too absorbed in their own internal conflicts to be greatly disturbed. When they defeated the Visigothic rulers of Spain in 711 and pushed the Christians up into the mountains in the north, they became a more immediate problem.

When they began to raid the Mediterranean coast of the Frankish kingdom and to extend their power north of the Pyrenees, Charles Martel, the Frankish ruler, collected his forces south of the Loire and in 732 defeated a Muslim band so decisively that they retreated. Nonetheless, Muslims continued to raid the Frankish seacoast on the Mediterranean. To stop these raids and to protect his frontier, Charlemagne carried the war beyond the Pyrenees to the south.

From Charlemagne's time to the beginning of the 11th century, relations between the Muslims and European Christians were mainly commercial and intellectual. There developed a flourishing trade in slaves and northern products such as honey, amber and furs. Muslims wanted slaves. Christian teaching forbade Christians to enslave other Christians, but there were always Finns, Slavs, and other pagan peoples to be captured, and commerce with Islam was profitable. Some of this traffic went down through central Europe to the Muslim world through the channels of Byzantine trade. Some of it went through Spain.

A great center of pilgrimage for Christians was St. James of Compostella in Muslim Spanish Galicia. Commercial contacts and pilgrimage led to awareness of Muslim learning, not to mention Muslim wealth and luxury. The Muslims had absorbed Greek learning as well as lore from Persia and India. They had produced a rich synthesis of their own. Some northerners, like Gerbert of Aurillac, who died Pope Sylvester II in 1103, did try to gain some knowledge from the Muslims, particularly of science. Cordoba and Toledo in Spain in the tenth century and Sicily in the 11th century could have been centers for transmission of Muslim culture to the West.

But Western Christians did not take advantage of these offerings, and they remained ignorant and indifferent with respect to Islam, the Muslim religion, and Muslim culture in general. In the "Song of Roland," for example, the Muslims are credited with a trinity of pagan deities -- Tervagan, Mahomet, and Apollo -- "gods of stone," whose idols they carry with them to war. Christians preferred not to know of a rival and more vigorous monotheism. Muslims could be credited with chivalry, as they often are in the literature of the 12th and 13th centuries, but they could not be credited with acceptable religious ideas.

For their part, the Muslims, before the Crusades, generally extended courteous hospitality to Christian pilgrims visiting the holy places in their realm. To them the Europeans from the West seemed crude and barbaric compared to themselves. They did not, any more than Greek Christians, think that Latin Christians held the future in their hands.

The causes of the long war between Western Christians and the Muslims are many and difficult to assess. In Spain the intensive phase of the Reconquista, which began in the eleventh century, was mainly a matter of seizing opportunity. The caliphate of Cordoba, which had included all of Muslim Spain since the 8th century, began to break up into small states warring with one another. In Sicily and southern Italy Norman adventurers who had passed through on pilgrimage to the Holy Land saw an opportunity to create a unified Christian state from the remnants of Byzantine power there and from Muslim Sicily. The main factor in bringing about the Crusades was the weakness of the eastern section of the Empire in relation to the Seljuk Turks.

The Byzantines had just endured a "time of troubles" in which the succession had been in dispute and the state system had collapsed. Alexius' appeal tot he West acknowledged the weakness. Ecclesiastical leaders in eastern Europe had long been troubled about internecine war among Christian nobles and knights. Gregory VII had wanted to divert this energy to war against the "infidel," but he had neither the time nor the resources to spare for the task. Alexius' appeal in 1095 seemed to offer a great opportunity.

Pope Urban II met with leaders among the French nobility at Clermont and delivered a rousing call. This is in part what he said:

"Frenchmen! You who come from across the Alps; You who have been singled out by God and who are loved by Him -- as is shown by your many accomplishments; you who are set apart from all other peoples by the location of your country, by your Catholic faith, and by the honor of the Holy Church; we address these words, this sermon to you!....Distressing news has come to us (as has often happened) from the region in Jerusalem and from the city of Constantinople; news that the people of the Persian kingdom, an alien people, a race completely foreign to God...has invade Christian territory and has invaded this territory with pillage, fire and the sword.

The Persians have taken some of these Christians as captives to their own country; they have destroyed others with cruel tortures. They have completely destroyed some of God's churches and have converted others to the uses of their own cult. They ruin the altars with filth and defilement. They circumcise Christians and smear the blood from the circumcision over the altars or throw it in the baptismal fonts. They are pleased to kill others by cutting open their bellies, extracting the ends of their intestines, and tying it to a stake....

And so the pope continues, with more atrocities listed, including the "shocking rape of women." No doubt atrocities did occur. They do constantly in human affairs, especially in the midst of wars. Urban II was less concerned to establish the truth about the Seljuks (Persians, he calls them) than to rouse the Franks. A skilled propagandist, he told them that they fought each other because their land was poor. Let them just put aside their local hatreds and conflicts and go to the Holy Land (as the Scriptures said, the land flowed with milk and honey) to put down the infidels who threatened their brethren and the holy places of Christendom. Thus, war to seize the land from the infidel became a "good thing."

The Crusaders surprised themselves and others by winning, by medieval standards, a quick initial victory. Despite the disastrous failure of a People's Crusade led by Peter the Hermit, the diversion of a number of German bands to the more immediate rewards of Jew-killing in Germany, and the difficulties the Frankish lords encountered in their relations with Byzantine Emperor Alexius, a western Army entered Jerusalem on July 15, 1099. A bloodbath ensued with the Crusaders cutting down all before them. A few Muslims escaped by buying their safe exit from the city.

The Jews took refuge in their chief synagogue and were all burnt within it. Muslims were killed as long as the blood lust lasted. In the words of a Christian witness:

"Our men followed [the city's defenders], killing and beheading them all the way to the Temple of Solomon. There was such slaughter there that our men waded in blood up to their ankles....Soon our men were running all around the city, seizing gold and silver, horses and mules, and houses filled with all kinds of goods. Rejoicing and weeping for joy, our people came to the sepulcher of Jesus our Savior to worship and pay our debt....Our men then took counsel and decided that everyone should pray and give alms so that God might choose for them whomever the pleased to rule over the others and govern the city....The living Saracens dragged the dead outside the gates and made heaps of them as large as houses. No one ever saw or heard of such a slaughter of pagan peoples, for funeral pyres were formed of them like pyramids and no one knows their number save God alone."

The massacre impressed the world. Many even among the Christians who participated were sickened and shamed by the brutality. When more humane and sane counsels did prevail in Christian circles, the Muslims remained justifiably distrustful and suspicious. Having destroyed Muslim power, the Crusaders had to set up a state. They took counsel as to who should be chosen to rule in the Holy Land. After much intrigue, Godfrey of Bouillon, Duke of Lower Lorraine, was offered the title of king. He chose instead to be called the Defender of the Holy Sepulcher, saying that he could not wear a crown of gold in the city where his Savior had worn a crown of thorns.

This was the catastrophic beginning of the long series of wars that marked the Crusade period. It does not much matter that the families of the permanent settlers in the Holy Land learned of necessity a great deal about Islamic material culture. The Holy Land did not flow with milk and honey and could not be made to support the Latin principalities there without commerce. Westerners had to learn from the Muslims how to live in a climate different form that of England and northern France.

Commerce with the enemies and adoption of Islamic foods, clothes, sanitary precautions as well as marriage with Muslim wives brought on the Latin Christians charges of betraying the Christian cause. Individual friendships between Muslims and Christians did develop, but these had no effect on the precarious nature of Christian rule in the land. Rivalries existed among the rulers of the Crusader states, and distrust between them and new arrivals was commonplace. Thus unity against the enemy was difficult to maintain.

In 1187 Saladin, who had overthrown the Fatimid caliphate in Egypt, expanded his power into Palestine and seized Jerusalem. The Crusaders were left holding only a narrow strip of coastal plain from Acre to Antioch. This remnant of the Latin kingdom they lost in the course of the next century. In 1291, when Acre fell, Christian rule in the Holy Land ceased to be a matter of practical politics. There were Crusades after 1300, but having no secure base from which to operate, they had no chance of success.

In 1144 St. Bernard of Clairvaux advocated a more military policy in dealing with the Muslim menace. So he organized the Second Crusade, a bigger and better organized expedition than the first. Two kings led this Crusade: Louis VII of France and Conrad III of Germany. Eleanor of Acquitaine (wife of Louis VII, who later divorce her) went along for the "ride." She and her attendant ladies dressed in the costume of Amazon princesses. The result was a fiasco of the first magnitude, one from which the Muslims derived the encouragement to go forward to throw the Westerners out. There was also a Third, Fourth, and Fifth Crusade, ending with equally disastrous consequences.




Send comments and questions to Professor Gerhard Rempel, Western New England College.